YOU SAID:

Rigid curriculum are better. I had little idea where we were going, and it didn't match what was in the syllabus. The material was very very very very very interesting but it was hard to organize my thoughts when the subject matter was fleeting. Less is more here. Maybe too much quantum field theory and differential geometry. Those courses can fill that knowledge gap if I want to take them. This course should have been entirely core quantum, and I think it should stay move in that direction in the future. Berry phase is great, and related items could be reviewed as well.

INTO JAPANESE

剛体のカリキュラムは優れています。行っていた何がシラバスにあったそれが一致していない小さなアイデアがもらった材料は非常に非常に非常に非常に非常に興味深いけれど、主題がつかの間だったときに私の考えを整理するは難しかった。ここで少ないです。 多分あまりにも多くの場の量子論と微分幾何学。これらのコースは、フィルをことができます。

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Rigid curriculum is excellent. When the material had little idea what was done was in the syllabus that does not match the very very very very very interesting, but it was fleeting theme to organize my thoughts is difficult. Here in the small

INTO JAPANESE

剛体のカリキュラムは優れています。材料は少し考えが一致しない、非常に非常に非常に非常に非常に興味深い、シラバスは、何が行われていたが、それがつかの間だった私の考えを整理するテーマが難しくなります。ここでは、小

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Rigid curriculum is excellent. My material does not match a little idea, very very very very very interesting, syllabus, what was done, but it was a fleeting idea organized a theme makes it difficult. Where's the small

INTO JAPANESE

剛体のカリキュラムは優れています。私の素材が少し考え、非常に非常に非常に非常に非常に興味深い、シラバス、行われていたものと一致しませんが、つかの間アイデア整理だったテーマが難しきます。小さいがあります。

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Rigid curriculum is excellent. Theme was a fleeting idea clutter does not match what little material I think, which was very very very very very interesting, syllabus, difficulties can be. There are small.