YOU SAID:
It makes sense that the Christoffel symbols are not tensors, since we defined it in a quite arbitrary fashion as the tangential components of the variation of the basis.
INTO JAPANESE
クリストッフェル記号がテンソルではないことは理にかなっています。これは、基底の変化の接線成分として非常に任意の方法で定義したためです。
BACK INTO ENGLISH
It makes sense that the Christoffel symbol is not a tensor. This is because it was defined in a very arbitrary way as the tangent component of the change in the basis.
INTO JAPANESE
クリストッフェル記号がテンソルではないことは理にかなっています。これは、基底の変化の接線成分として非常に任意の方法で定義されたためです。
BACK INTO ENGLISH
It makes sense that the Christoffel symbol is not a tensor. This is because it was defined in a very arbitrary way as the tangent component of the change in the basis.
You love that! Don't you?