YOU SAID:

I agree with this statement to a great extent. The reasons I believe this are by no means far and few in between–there’s a great many, in fact. Let’s discuss. We’ll start with the League’s structural issues. Their voting and decision-making processes were downright ineffecient. For starters, the Assembly of the League (all of its nations have a meeting) only happened once a year. Sure, there was the Council, a group comprised of major countries that met more often and also in cases of emergency, but they surely didn’t meet for every conflict in the world. Even when this Assembly did meet, their voting process required a unanimous decision (all parties agree) to go forth with any action. This meant that their Assembly could barely get anything done on the rare occasions that it could have. These decisions that they did make could often not mean anything at all, however. Countries were working things out on their own-they signed their own anti-war treaty, they resolved some of their own conflicts. These began to make the League seem unnecessary and pointless. These decisions could also have no effect because the League didn’t really have a good military force. This is in part due to Britain and France not wanting to sacrifice their own soldiers; the League had collective security (all countries band together to defend against conflict), which wouldn’t have been a problem if most of the League’s countries weren’t either seeking protection or too big to care. If a country wanted to resist one of the League’s decisions, all the League could do was resort to trade sanctions, which barely worked, considering that... The League was missing several countries that were the hook, line, and sinker to forming an international police force-Russia, Germany, and the United States. Russia wasn’t invited to join because of their extreme Communist party; similarly, Germany wasn’t invited because of its actions in World War 1. The United States didn’t care at all about the League; their force was big enough so that they could deal with their own problems, and they didn’t want to expend it solving every little conflict in the world. This is the reason the League’s trade sanctions didn’t work-they only had authority amongst themselves. The condemned country could just turn elsewhere for trade, and the sanctions would only gum up the economies of the countries that rejected trade. Finally, the League’s compromised interests were a big internal problem with it. While Britain wanted to protect its empire with the League, France wanted to subdue Germany by enforcing the treaties. The League had the added nefarious motive of wanting to appeal to powerful countries more than enforcing justice. The Corfu incident is a great example of this; the League made an unethical decision for the sake of their image to Mussolini of Italy. This, although good for Italy, wasn’t good for justice, the League’s main purpose. That just isn’t right. So, in conclusion, I agree that the League had failed before the Great Depression to a great extent. Their lack of a military and certain powerhouse countries left it weak. Their voting process and only occasional meetings left them slow. Their internal conflicts and unethical decisions left them misguided. All in all, it’s easy to say that the Great Depression was just the last straw for the League and that they failed before it even started.

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの程度までこの声明に同意します。理由と思いますこれは決してこれまで、いくつかの間そこの多くの偉大な実際には。について説明しましょう。 我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題から始めましょう。彼らの投票および意思決定のプロセスは実に ineffecient だったまず、(すべての民族は会議を持っている) リーグのアセンブリだけ年に一度を起こった。確かに、評議会より頻繁に会った主要国の構成 ca のグループがあった

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a bit far, there many great fact. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They vote and the decision making process was very ineffecient, (all ethnic groups that have Conference) League Assembly only happened once in. Indeed

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。 について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼ら投票と意思決定のプロセスは非常に ineffecient、(すべての民族グループ会議を持つ) で、リーグ アセンブリを一度だけ起こった。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They vote and the decision making process is very ineffecient, (with all ethnic groups meeting) in the League Assembly that happened just once. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。 これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼ら投票と意思決定のプロセスは非常に ineffecient、(すべての民族グループ会議) で一度だけ起こったリーグ アセンブリ。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They vote and the decision making process is the League Assembly very ineffecient, (all ethnic groups meeting) happened only once. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らが投票し、意思決定のプロセスはリーグ アセンブリ非常に ineffecient、(会議のすべての民族グループ) は一度だけ起こった。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They vote, decision making process the League Assembly very ineffecient, (meeting of all ethnic groups) that only happened once. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは、意思決定プロセスのリーグ アセンブリ非常に ineffecient、投票 (すべての民族グループの会議) には一度だけ起こった。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They are League Assembly of the decision making process very happened only once to ineffecient and voting (meetings of all the ethnic groups). Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは、意思決定プロセス非常に ineffecient に一度だけ起こったと投票 (すべての民族グループの会議) のリーグ アセンブリが。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They happened only once, in the making decisions process very ineffecient and League Assembly voting (meetings of all the ethnic groups). Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは、意思決定プロセス非常に ineffecient とリーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの会議) を投票で一度だけ起こった。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They are making decision process very ineffecient and League Assembly (meeting of all the ethnic groups) in the vote happened only once. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは、プロセスの非常に ineffecient と投票でリーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの会議) が一度だけ起こった決定を作っています。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They are making the decision process very ineffecient and vote the League Assembly (meeting of all the ethnic groups) happened only once. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは、意思決定プロセスの非常に ineffecient を作っているし、リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの会議) の投票は一度だけ起こった。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They are making decision-making process very ineffecient and a vote of the League Assembly (meeting of all the ethnic groups) it happened just once. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは、意思決定プロセスの非常に ineffecient、投票を作っているリーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの会議) のそれは一度だけ起こった。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They are in the decision making process very ineffecient, vote making League Assembly (meeting of all the ethnic groups) it happened only once. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは非常に ineffecient を処理、リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの会) を作り、投票の意思、それは一度だけ起こった。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They handle very ineffecient, making the League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), voting intentions, it happened only once. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは非常に ineffecient、リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの会) を作り、投票の意思、それは一度だけ起こったを処理します。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They make very ineffecient, League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), voting intentions, it happened only once the process. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは非常に ineffecient、作るリーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの協会)、投票の意思、それはプロセスで起こった一度だけ。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They make very ineffecient, League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), voting intention, it's only once in the process. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らは非常に ineffecient、リーグ アセンブリを作る (すべての民族グループの協会)、投票の意思、それはプロセスで一度だけです。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. They make a very ineffecient, a League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), voting intentions, but only once in the process is. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。彼らを作る非常に ineffecient、リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの協会)、議決権の意図がプロセスで一度だけです。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. Make them very ineffecient League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), voting intentions in the process once it is. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。それら非常に ineffecient リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの協会)、プロセスで一度投票の意思です。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. Those very ineffecient League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), a process once voting intention is. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。これらの非常に ineffecient リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの協会)、プロセスが意思を投票します。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. These very ineffecient League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), process the vote decision. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。これらの非常に ineffecient リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの協会)、投票決定を処理します。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree with this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. These handles very ineffecient League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), voting decisions. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこの声明に同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。これらのハンドル非常に ineffecient リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの協会)、投票決定。確かに

BACK INTO ENGLISH

I agree to this statement to a considerable extent. Why I think this is a little bit far, there many great facts. About let me explain. We begin with the structural problems of the League. Handle these very ineffecient League Assembly (Association of all the ethnic groups), voting decisions. Certainly

INTO JAPANESE

私はかなりの範囲にこのステートメントに同意します。これは少し遠いと思いますなぜ、そこの多くの偉大な事実。について説明しましょう。我々 は、リーグの構造的な問題で始まります。これらの非常に ineffecient リーグ アセンブリ (すべての民族グループの協会)、処理の決定を投票します。確かに