YOU SAID:

Find quotes for these claims In Annihilation, Vandermeer puts epistemology to the test through the way he writes the biologist as a complex character with complex thoughts. Throughout the novel, the biologist is resistant to the changes occurring within herself. Although she has a curious mind and is constantly searching for answers and the ways in which Area X is different from what she knows through her training, she ignores the ways in which Area X is changing her. At the end of the novel, however, the biologist finally accepts her transformation and becomes enlightened not to what Area X is, but what it is not. After her encounter with the Crawler, she is able to understand, in a sense, how Area X functions. Vandermeer poses the question to the reader whether knowing is better than unknowing, and at the end of the novel, pushes the reader to believe that knowing, although sometimes through a painful process such as the biologists encounter with the crawler, is better for the future. Similarly, Viramontes ponders the same question in her novel, Under the Feet of Jesus. Estrella’s family and all of the other farmworkers are being poisoned by pesticides, and although to a degree they know what is happening, they do not truly see the effects until Alejo, a farmworker, becomes extremely ill due to heavy exposure to the chemicals. On the surface, one might believe that unknowing is better, or “ignorance is bliss” but with a deeper reading, one can see that Viramontes pushes the reader to believe that knowledge, although painful, is better and leads to a better future. In chapter 1, the biologist becomes exposed to the fungi in the tower which later she finds out makes her immune to the psychologist’s hypnoses. “ This is the first change that the biologist notices in herself, but this is the extent of change to which the accepts. In chapter _, the biologist realizes that the goal of the expedition was not as they were told. This starts chaos in the biologist’s mind and she becomes resistant to the idea of change as she is trying to figure out what the real goal of the expedition is. Even though she notices that after being exposed to the fungi in the tower she is resistant to hypnosis, this is the extent to which she sees change.

INTO JAPANESE

これらの請求の見積もりを検索する 消滅では、ヴァンダーメールは、彼が複雑な思考を持つ複雑なキャラクターとして生物学者を書く方法を通してテストに認識論を置きます。小説を通して、生物学者は自分自身の中で起こっている変化に抵抗する。彼女は好奇心旺盛な心を持ち、常に答えと道を探していますが

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Find quotes for these billings In annihilation, Vandermer puts epistemology on the test through how he writes biologists as complex characters with complex thoughts. Through novels, biologists resist the changes that are taking place within themselves. She likes

INTO JAPANESE

これらの請求の見積もりを検索する 消滅において、ヴァンダーマーは生物学者を複雑な思考を持つ複雑なキャラクターとして書く方法を通して、認識論をテストに置きます。小説を通して、生物学者は自分自身の中で起こっている変化に抵抗します。彼女は好きです

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Find quotes for these billings In annihilation, Vandermer puts epistemology into testing through the way biologists write as complex characters with complex thoughts. Through novels, biologists resist the changes that are happening within themselves. She likes

INTO JAPANESE

これらの請求の見積もりを検索する 消滅において、ヴァンダーマーは、生物学者が複雑な思考を持つ複雑な文字として書く方法を通して、認識論をテストに入れます。小説を通して、生物学者は自分自身の中で起こっている変化に抵抗します。彼女は好きです

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Find quotes for these billings In annihilation, Vandermer tests epistemology through the way biologists write as complex characters with complex thoughts. Through novels, biologists resist the changes that are happening within themselves. I like her.

INTO JAPANESE

これらの請求の見積もりを検索する 消滅では、ヴァンダーマーは生物学者が複雑な思考を持つ複雑な文字として書く方法を通して認識論をテストします。小説を通して、生物学者は自分自身の中で起こっている変化に抵抗します。私は彼女が好きです。

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Find quotes for these billings In annihilation, Vandermer tests epistemology through the way biologists write as complex characters with complex thoughts. Through novels, biologists resist the changes that are happening within themselves. I like her.