YOU SAID:

According to current international human rights law, most states have both positive and negative obligations. What are the positive obligations that most states have committed themselves to and what is the treaty that forms the basis for these obligations? What are the negative obligations that most states have committed themselves to and what is the treaty that forms the basis for these obligations?

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとは、ほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務をあります。 ほとんどの州は彼ら自身をコミットしている肯定的な義務とこれらの義務のための基礎を形作る条約は何ですか。 ほとんどの州がコミット消極的義務とは何ですか

BACK INTO ENGLISH

According to the current international human rights law, most States are both positive and negative obligations. Most States the Treaty forms the basis for a positive duty to commit themselves with these obligations? Most States have committed passive obligation?

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。 ほとんどの州、条約は、これらの義務にコミットする自分に肯定的な義務のための基礎を形作る?ほとんどの州は、受動的な義務をコミットしていますか?

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. Most States, Treaty, forms the basis for a positive duty to commit to these obligations? or most States are committed to a passive obligation?

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。条約は、ほとんどの州は、これらの義務にコミットする肯定的な義務のための基礎を形作る?ほとんどの州は、受動的な義務に取り組んでいますか。

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. Convention forms the basis for a positive duty to commit to these obligations most States? most States that are working on a passive obligation?.

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。条約はこれらの義務にコミットする肯定的な義務のための基礎を形作るほとんどの州か。受動的な義務に取り組んでいるほとんどの州か。

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. The Treaty forms the basis for a positive duty to commit to the obligations of these most States? Most are working on a passive obligation of States?

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。条約は、これらのほとんどの州の義務にコミットする肯定的な義務のための基礎を形作るか。ほとんどは、合衆国の受動的な義務に取り組んでいますか

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. Convention forms the basis for a positive duty to commit to the obligations of most of these States? Most are working on a passive obligation of the United States?

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。条約はこれらの状態のほとんどの義務にコミットする肯定的な義務のための基礎を形作る?ほとんどは、アメリカ合衆国の受動的な義務に取り組んでいますか

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. Convention forms the basis for a positive duty to commit to the obligations of most of those States? most are working on a passive obligation of the United States of America?

INTO JAPANESE

現在の国際人権法によるとほとんどの州は、正と負の両方の義務です。条約はこれらの州のほとんどの義務にコミットする肯定的な義務のための基礎を形作る?ほとんどは、アメリカ合衆国の受動的な義務に取り組んでいますか

BACK INTO ENGLISH

Most States according to current international human rights law is duty of both positive and negative. Convention forms the basis for a positive duty to commit to the obligations of most of those States? most are working on a passive obligation of the United States of America?